Great Prospects for the full basket of ‘energy metals’
The end-use applications of lithium-ion batteries are multiplying at a breakneck pace. Battery makers have responded aggressively and we have a new peak of lithium-ion battery manufacturing capacity in the pipeline. An additional 153 GWh has been added to planned capacity build-outs last year alone, taking the total to 372 GWh. It shows no signs of stopping and, indeed, analysts expect the market to require about 750 GWh of capacity by 2025, of which 645 GWh is for EVs alone.
The market has long been excited about electric vehicles (EVs), including the emergence of large, all-electric trucks and busses, and the more recent unveiling of an ocean-going electric freight-carrying vessel. However, several grid-connected energy storage installations, such as the Hornsdale energy storage in Australia, seem to have taken the market largely by surprize and, to be honest, we’re really just scratching the surface of energy metal usage.
We are increasingly seeing new technologies pushing into the mass market, such as consumer and commercial drones, which combine several existing technologies into one and 5G-connected ambulances, which can access digitized trauma data and perform procedures in transit. There is also robotics, artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, quantum computing, biotechnology, The Internet of Things, 3D printing and autonomous vehicles – all of which require significant amounts of energy metals to become commercially viable.
Such incredible growth comes at a price. The manufacturing world is now finding, for example, that cathode buyers are seeking up to 500% more product than they used to purchase. It’s an amazing situation for what, until recently, was a somewhat slow-but-steady-paced industry.
This, of course, has been great for cobalt investors and lithium too. However, battery metals are more than just the two major headline-grabbers and I feel this is a good time to touch on a few other metals in the basket: nickel and graphite.
Compared to lithium and now cobalt, nickel has been much slower to receive attention and I find that interesting. Not only is nickel a key battery material but, in terms of increasing battery-grade capacity, nickel has a similar challenge to lithium. Nickel sulphate supplies need to go from about 75 000 t today, to at the very least 200 000t by 2025. Such increases in capacity are not dissimilar to lithium’s – three, four, even five times greater than we have today. The problem is that nickel is largely driven by steel demand, so we’re talking about a profound shift and I feel that nickel is just starting its journey.
In the case of graphite – the high-quality, large-flake material used as the anode material in lithium-ion batteries – prices have lagged behind those of lithium and cobalt thus far. The global market comprises about 650 000 t/y, however, it is estimated that, should just 1% of the auto market comprise EVs, it would consume up to 100 000 t of flake concentrate….
The market is anticipating that there will be a 300% increase in demand for high-quality graphite by 2025, given that a lithium-ion battery requires 10 to 20 times more graphite than it does lithium. Combined with an increasingly positive outlook for the global steel market, and the explosive growth of the EV market, several new graphite mines will be required to lock in supplies for the future base case scenario.
The scale and speed of this battery-fuelled, industrial revolution and its incredible hunger for resources is the reason we founded Cobalt 27 because, of all the battery metals, cobalt is the hardest to get exposure to. However, as I look around, it’s clear that cobalt isn’t the only battery metal that has a lot to offer investors.
Anthony Milewski, Chairman of Nickel 28
About Anthony Milewski
Mr. Anthony Milewski has spent his career in various aspects of the mining industry, including as a company director, advisor, founder and investor. In particular, he has been active in the commodities related to decarbonization and the energy transition, including nickel, cobalt, copper and carbon credits. Anthony has served on the London Metals Exchange Cobalt Committee, which includes representatives from the largest mining and commodities companies globally, to represent the interests of the industry to the board of directors the LME. Mr. Anthony Milewski holds a B.A. in Russian history from Brigham Young University, an M.A. in Russian and Central Asian Studies from the University of Washington, and a J.D. from the University of Washington. Anthony Milewski has been interviewed by numerous Media outlets, including BNN, The Financial Times, Bloomberg, The Northern Miner and many others. Most recently, Anthony Milewski has written op-ed articles for leading mining publications including The Northern Miner.
Forward-Looking Information: Some of the posted entries on the CEO Corner may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements address future events and conditions which involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by them. Examples of forward looking information and assumptions include future estimates of the worldwide supply and demand for nickel and other metals and the effect that these changes could have on the short term and long term price of nickel and other metals on the world markets, statements regarding the future operating or financial performance of Nickel 28 including the net present value, metal recoveries, capital costs, operating costs, production, rates of return and payback. Forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may not prove to be accurate. Such statements are qualified in their entirety by the inherent risks and uncertainties surrounding future expectations. Among those factors which could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: market conditions and other risk factors listed from time to time in our reports filed with Canadian securities regulators on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "projects", "plans", "anticipates" and similar expressions. These statements represent management's expectations or beliefs concerning, among other things, future operations and various components thereof affecting the economic performance of Nickel 28. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements which are based upon management's assumptions and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including the business risks discussed above, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Accordingly, readers are cautioned that events or circumstances could cause results to differ materially from those predicted.
Links: Some of the posted entries on the CEO Corner may include links to 3rd party websites. Nickel 28 has not reviewed all websites linked to or from this Site and is not responsible for the contents of any such websites. The inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement by Nickel 28 of the linked website or its content. Use of any such linked website is at the user's own risk.
For further information we refer you to our legal notice.