Sign Up for Updates  

The Electric Vehicle Thematic

“Renault-Nissan agrees deal to make electric cars in China”

“Honda is firing back at Tesla and other automakers by rolling out 2 electric cars by 2018”

“How manufacturers are gearing up to seize the opportunity in electric vehicle space”  

The headlines above are just a few of those published in the last couple of days. Each week brings more announcements by automakers the world over, concerning their EV (electric vehicle) progress.

Not that the news is all being generated by automakers. Governments – both regional and national – have also been crystal clear about their determination to see EV’s enter the mainstream and eventually replace the combustion-powered cars.

Just last month, the U.K., France and the Netherlands, announced plans to ban diesel engines by 2040. Despite initial denials, the EU is said to be considering a California-style mandate, obliging car-makers to meet a minimum fleet quota for electric vehicles. China has already taken the lead in this direction, by announcing a policy requiring all manufacturers sell a minimum of 8% “new energy vehicles” by 2018. While reports suggest this may be delayed to 2019, the fact is that governments are serious about the EV revolution.

So, EV penetration rate is accelerating and, importantly for battery metal investors, it’s doing so far more quickly than most people anticipated. Yes, this is partly due to government support. However, it’s also because EV’s are reaching parity with gas-powered cars on both costs and functionality.

What do I mean by functionality? Well in previous years, EV’s weren’t just prohibitively expensive for the average consumer, they also had issues with the distance they could travel between battery recharges. Thanks to the rapid advances in battery technology, many models can now travel over 200km on a single charge, which puts them in line with the requirements of the average commuter.

The rate of advance in battery efficiency and cost shows no signs of slowing. Right now, the primary EV battery chemistry formulation is an NMC based on a 5-3-2 ratio: five parts nickel, three parts manganese, two parts cobalt (Tesla is unique in that it uses an NCA formulation).  Over the next few years, the industry will move to the next generation of battery tech, using a 6-2-2 configuration and, in an estimated four to five years, we will likely see batteries built on future-tech, utilizing an 8-1-1 ratio.  The result will be further cost reductions and increased battery life.

Just as the early cell phone brands (pre-smart phone) used to compete on “talk time” for a fully-charged battery, so EV’s will compete on distance travelled until the point, in the not-to-distant future, at which the life of a single charge will be so great that it will cease to be an issue. 

For battery metal investors, particularly those looking to get into cobalt, these advances are a good thing. It’s true that advances in battery tech will mean less cobalt per battery but, to be honest, that’s a necessary move for EV’s to become mass market. The reason being, the next few years are going to see increased shortages of cobalt, which is good for increased cobalt prices but, over the long-term, would hurt the battery price reductions required for mass adoption. So, less cobalt per battery but more batteries being made. Whichever way you cut it, cobalt’s future is bright.

EV’s are just one part of the battery market picture. In a future post, I’ll get into the prospects for the energy storage market, which may very well be even bigger than the EV sector. 

I’ll leave you with this infographic on battery metals from the Visual Capitalist and, as always, if you have any questions, be sure to get in touch.

Anthony Milewski, Director, Cobalt 27

infographic on battery metals

Anthony Milewski, Chairman of Nickel 28

About Anthony Milewski

Mr. Anthony Milewski has spent his career in various aspects of the mining industry, including as a company director, advisor, founder and investor.  In particular, he has been active in the commodities related to decarbonization and the energy transition, including nickel, cobalt, copper and carbon credits. Anthony has served on the London Metals Exchange Cobalt Committee, which includes representatives from the largest mining and commodities companies globally, to represent the interests of the industry to the board of directors the LME. Mr. Milewski holds a B.A. in Russian history from Brigham Young University, an M.A. in Russian and Central Asian Studies from the University of Washington, and a J.D. from the University of Washington. Anthony Milewski has been interviewed by numerous Media outlets, including BNN, The Financial Times, Bloomberg, The Northern Miner and many others. Most recently, Anthony Milewski has written op-ed articles for leading mining publications including The Northern Miner. Anthony Milewski predicted the surge in nickel demand as early as 2017.

Forward-Looking Information: Some of the posted entries on the CEO Corner may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements address future events and conditions which involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by them. Examples of forward looking information and assumptions include future estimates of the worldwide supply and demand for nickel and other metals and the effect that these changes could have on the short term and long term price of nickel and other metals on the world markets, statements regarding the future operating or financial performance of Nickel 28 including the net present value, metal recoveries, capital costs, operating costs, production, rates of return and payback. Forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may not prove to be accurate. Such statements are qualified in their entirety by the inherent risks and uncertainties surrounding future expectations. Among those factors which could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: market conditions and other risk factors listed from time to time in our reports filed with Canadian securities regulators on SEDAR at

In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "projects", "plans", "anticipates" and similar expressions. These statements represent management's expectations or beliefs concerning, among other things, future operations and various components thereof affecting the economic performance of Nickel 28. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements which are based upon management's assumptions and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including the business risks discussed above, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Accordingly, readers are cautioned that events or circumstances could cause results to differ materially from those predicted.

Links: Some of the posted entries on the CEO Corner may include links to 3rd party websites. Nickel 28 has not reviewed all websites linked to or from this Site and is not responsible for the contents of any such websites. The inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement by Nickel 28 of the linked website or its content. Use of any such linked website is at the user's own risk.

For further information we refer you to our legal notice.