US at Risk of Being Left Behind Amid Battery Boom
The US seems to be getting serious about its role in the future of global manufacturing, especially since it entails a switch to the green economy that is reliant on energy storage.
The rising urgency with which US lawmakers are looking for answers is reflected by the recent summoning of London-based Benchmark Mineral Intelligence MD, Simon Moores, to testify before the US Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. This was his second testimonial in fourteen months and the US Congress has good reason to be worried.
Simon Moores, who appeared on the Cobalt 27 Electric Metals blog back in October, is considered one of the world’s leading energy metals analysts. He has suggested we are in the midst of a global battery arms race in which the US is presently a bystander. This was far from his only comment and I think it’s worth touching on some of the testimonial highlights.
He said those who controlled the critical raw materials and those who possessed the manufacturing and processing know-how, would hold the balance of industrial power in the 21st century auto and energy storage industries.
Moores said Benchmark is tracking 70 lithium-ion battery megafactories under construction across four continents, 46 of which are based in China and only five are currently planned for the US. The total number under construction has ballooned from only seventeen in October 2017….
While the US can safely be credited with kicking off the global megafactory paradigm shift with Tesla's Gigafactory 1, which coincidentally was the world's biggest battery plant and fourth biggest battery producer in 2018, it is now trailing (in terms of announced developments) by a wide margin.
Moores pointed out that, since October 2017, planned lithium-ion battery capacity in the pipeline for the period 2019-2028 has risen from 289GWh to 1,549GWh (1.54TWh), according to Benchmark's February 2019 assessment.
This expanded capacity is the equivalent of 23 to 24 million sedan-sized electric vehicles (EVs). This increasing scale will be a contributing factor in pushing lithium-ion battery production costs below $100/kWh in 2019. This figure has long seen as a tipping point for the adoption of mass market EVs.
At the beginning of 2019, the US had "a minor to non-existent role" in most of the key lithium-ion battery raw materials and only had a presence in lithium-ion battery manufacturing via Tesla. Tesla and its Gigafactory 1 was emerging as “the most strategic US asset in the EV supply chain”.
Moores testified that the growth trajectory expected for lithium-ion battery raw material demand was unprecedented. "Lithium-ion batteries are becoming a major global industry and the impact on the four key raw materials of lithium, cobalt, nickel and graphite will be profound."
The theoretical demand, assuming every plant gets built and used at 100% planned capacity, will require an 865% increase in lithium supply by 2028 over 2017 figures. Similarly, graphite anodes will require 800% more by 2028. Cobalt supply will need to grow 408% (taking into account thrifting) and Class 1 nickel will have to expand an astounding 1,810% or 19 times by 2028 to meet forecast demand.
Of course, not every planned construction makes it through to production but then again, I doubt we will see this global megafactory trend slowing any time soon and I would not be at all surprised to see more “new build” announcements from around the world.
The further we progress with the electrification revolution, the more apparent its incredible scale.
Don’t hesitate to get in touch with any questions.
Anthony Milewski, Chairman of Nickel 28
About Anthony Milewski
Mr. Anthony Milewski has spent his career in various aspects of the mining industry, including as a company director, advisor, founder and investor. In particular, he has been active in the commodities related to decarbonization and energy transition. Anthony has served on the London Metals Exchange Cobalt Committee, which includes representatives from the largest mining and commodities companies globally, to represent the interests of the industry to the board of directors the LME. Mr. Milewski holds a B.A. in Russian history from Brigham Young University, an M.A. in Russian and Central Asian Studies from the University of Washington, and a J.D. from the University of Washington. Mr. Milewski has been interviewed by numerous Media outlets, including BNN, The Financial Times, Bloomberg, The Northern Miner and many others. Most recently, Anthony Milewski has written op-ed articles for leading mining publications including The Northern Miner.
Forward-Looking Information: Some of the posted entries on the CEO Corner may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements address future events and conditions which involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by them. Examples of forward looking information and assumptions include future estimates of the worldwide supply and demand for nickel and other metals and the effect that these changes could have on the short term and long term price of nickel and other metals on the world markets, statements regarding the future operating or financial performance of Nickel 28 including the net present value, metal recoveries, capital costs, operating costs, production, rates of return and payback. Forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties which may not prove to be accurate. Such statements are qualified in their entirety by the inherent risks and uncertainties surrounding future expectations. Among those factors which could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: market conditions and other risk factors listed from time to time in our reports filed with Canadian securities regulators on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "expect", "projects", "plans", "anticipates" and similar expressions. These statements represent management's expectations or beliefs concerning, among other things, future operations and various components thereof affecting the economic performance of Nickel 28. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements which are based upon management's assumptions and are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including the business risks discussed above, which may cause actual performance and financial results in future periods to differ materially from any projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Accordingly, readers are cautioned that events or circumstances could cause results to differ materially from those predicted.
Links: Some of the posted entries on the CEO Corner may include links to 3rd party websites. Nickel 28 has not reviewed all websites linked to or from this Site and is not responsible for the contents of any such websites. The inclusion of any link does not imply endorsement by Nickel 28 of the linked website or its content. Use of any such linked website is at the user's own risk.
For further information we refer you to our legal notice.